Dishonour Abuse Is Child Abuse

Dishonour Abuse Is Child Abuse: What This Means for Safeguarding Practice

At Freedom Charity, we work with children and adults affected by forced marriage, family coercion and related forms of abuse carried out in the name of so-called “honour”.

We are clear about this: dishonour abuse is child abuse.

Too often, people describe this harm as cultural, private or sensitive. In reality, it is a safeguarding failure that causes serious harm to children when warning signs are missed, minimised or acted on too late.

This blog explains what dishonour abuse looks like in practice, why children struggle to disclose it, and what effective safeguarding requires. Above all, it is written to support understanding, confidence and early action.


What is dishonour abuse?

Dishonour abuse describes a range of abusive behaviours used by families or extended networks to control children and young people who are perceived to have brought “shame” or “dishonour” on the family.

For example, it can include:

Where a child does not have a genuine choice, consent cannot exist. As a result, these behaviours meet the threshold for child abuse and safeguarding intervention under UK law.

Importantly, language matters. When people describe this harm as “honour-based”, it risks softening what is happening. There is no honour in the abuse of a child. Instead, the dishonour lies with the abuse itself and with systems that fail to intervene.


What dishonour abuse looks like in practice

Dishonour abuse rarely appears as a single dramatic incident. Instead, it usually develops through patterns over time.

Common indicators include:

On their own, these signs may have more than one explanation. However, when they appear together, they can indicate serious risk. For this reason, safeguarding depends on noticing patterns early rather than waiting for certainty.


Why children struggle to disclose abuse

Children affected by dishonour abuse face specific barriers when trying to speak out.

For instance, they may be:

As a result, silence often feels safer than disclosure. This means safeguarding systems cannot rely on children telling their stories. Instead, protection depends on adults recognising risk and acting on concern.


Why delay and hesitation increase risk

Safeguarding failures in dishonour abuse cases rarely come from indifference. More often, they result from hesitation.

In practice, this can involve:

Each delay increases risk. Once plans for forced marriage, removal from education or relocation move forward, a child’s choices narrow quickly. Therefore, early action can prevent harm, while late action often means responding after damage has already occurred.

Safeguarding requires clarity as well as caution.


Why language matters in safeguarding

Language directly shapes professional response.

When abuse is framed as cultural or sensitive, intervention often slows down. By contrast, when professionals name it clearly as child abuse, safeguarding pathways become clearer and action becomes more decisive.

Using the term dishonour abuse helps to:

Clear language does not stigmatise communities. Instead, it protects children.


What to do if you are worried about a child

If you are concerned about a child or young person who may be at risk of dishonour abuse, you should:

In safeguarding, inaction is never neutral. Acting early can prevent harm and protect children from irreversible outcomes.


Further reading and evidence

For those who wish to explore the UK evidence, data patterns and safeguarding duties in greater depth, Freedom Charity’s Founder, Aneeta Prem, has set this out in detail here:

https://www.aneeta.com/blog/dishonour-abuse-is-child-abuse


A final word

Dishonour abuse is child abuse. It thrives on silence, hesitation and uncertainty.

Children affected by family coercion cannot wait for systems to become comfortable. Safeguarding works best when concerns are named clearly and acted on early. That is how harm is prevented. That is how children are protected.